|
Intel Core i7-6950X vs Intel Core i5-10500 |
|
Processor comparisons 24-03-2021 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-6950X vs Intel Core i5-10500 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, 3DMark, SuperPi, 7zip, Handbrake, Blender, Blender, RealBench, UserBenchmark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10500 or Intel Core i7-6950X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-6950X | 55% |
Core i5-10500 | 54% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-6950X is 1% better than Core i5-10500. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-6950X | 56% |
Core i5-10500 | 54% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.4 | 95.4 | Valorant | 113.0 | 108.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.3 | 60.7 | Apex Legends | 106.2 | 101.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.7 | 81.3 | Overwatch | 91.5 | 87.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.9 | 74.8 | DOOM Eternal | 56.5 | 54.2 | Warzone | 88.1 | 84.5 | Assassin's Creed | 94.9 | 91.0 | Valheim | 93.8 | 90.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-6950X | 28% |
Core i5-10500 | 61% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-10500 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-6950X as it consumes less power: 140W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-6950X |
Intel Core i5-10500 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 152 | 201 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1819 | 1491 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 498 | 467 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4827 | 3392 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1091 | 1082 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12713 | 8209 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-6950X |
Intel Core i5-10500 | Single-Core | 2377 | 2743 | Multi-Core | 17125 | 13414 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-6950X |
Intel Core i5-10500 | Single-Core | 1204 | 1196 | Multi-Core | 11187 | 7233 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-6950X |
Intel Core i5-10500 | Announcement date | April 01, 2016 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | LGA2011-v3 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Broadwell E | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 6 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Cores | 10 | 6 | Threads | 20 | 12 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | 4800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 140 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4 2400/2133 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 25 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-10500 is 3% better than Core i7-6950X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-6950X has 4 more core than Core i5-10500. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-6950X is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10500 is better: 11 However, it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-6950X and Intel Core i5-10500 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-6950X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i5-13500T
Intel Core i5-10500 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
| |
|