 |
Intel Core i3-13100T vs Intel Core i5-10500 |
|
Processor comparisons 31-01-2023
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-13100T vs Intel Core i5-10500 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Blender, 7zip, AIDA64, Blender, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, PassMark, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, RealBench, 3DMark, SuperPi, Handbrake, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10500 or Intel Core i3-13100T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13100T | 57% |
Core i5-10500 | 54% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13100T is 5% better than Core i5-10500. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13100T | 54% |
Core i5-10500 | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.1 | 95.4 | | Valorant | 108.1 | 108.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 60.7 | | Apex Legends | 101.6 | 101.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.1 | 81.3 | | Overwatch | 87.6 | 87.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.6 | 74.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 54.2 | | Warzone | 84.3 | 84.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.8 | 91.0 | | Valheim | 89.7 | 90.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13100T | 158% |
Core i5-10500 | 61% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13100T is more energy efficient than the Core i5-10500 since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i5-10500 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 208 | 201 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2294 | 1491 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 358 | 467 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5114 | 3392 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1287 | 1082 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14731 | 8209 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i5-10500 | | Single-Core | 1174 | 2743 | | Multi-Core | 25118 | 13414 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i5-10500 | | Single-Core | 1659 | 1196 | | Multi-Core | 6987 | 7233 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i5-10500 | | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4.5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 6 | | Threads | 8 | 12 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 4800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-13100T is 8% better than Core i5-10500 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-10500 has 2 more core than Core i3-13100T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13100T is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10500 is better: 19
However, it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13100T and Intel Core i5-10500 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-13100T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i5-10500 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
|
|
|
