|
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 |
|
Comparisons 08-03-2023 Detailed testing data of Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Exynos 1380 or Exynos 7 Octa 7885.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreExynos 1380 | 31% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | 9% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Exynos 1380 | 89% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingExynos 1380 | 28% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | 7% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 1380 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | Total score | 418841 | 136471 | CPU | 117285 | 38211 | GPU | 159165 | 51853 | MEM | 67014 | 21835 | UX | 75388 | 24556 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 1380 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | Single-Core | 750 | 279 | Multi-Core | 2036 | 1228 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 1380 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2100 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 4800 millions | | Core configuration | 2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 8 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 64 KB | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 1380 is 12% better than Exynos 7 Octa 7885 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Mali-G71 MP18 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 546 MHz | GFloPS | 1026 | 334 | # of Cores | 5 | 18 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.1 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 54.2 | 26.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 56.4 | 37.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 40.7 | 34.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 45.9 | 25.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 74.9 | 37.7 | Real Racing 3 | 84.6 | 65.3 | Sniper 3D | 106.3 | 48.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 67.7 | 67.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 64.5 | 42.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 78.6 | 44.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 28 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 28 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Exynos Modem 5300 | LTE Cat.13 3CA | Download speed | 3790 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1280 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo, GPS, Glonass, Beidou, SBAS, QZSS | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 1380 is better: 36
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 is better: 2 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Exynos 1380 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|