|
Allwinner A523 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 |
|
Comparisons 13-06-2023 Comprehensive testing data of Allwinner A523 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like PassMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Neocore, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, PCMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, GTA etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy A523 or Exynos 7 Octa 7885.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreA523 | 12% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | 9% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)A523 | 53% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingA523 | 9% |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | 7% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | A523 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | Total score | 167563 | 136471 | CPU | 46909 | 38211 | GPU | 63678 | 51853 | MEM | 26807 | 21835 | UX | 30170 | 24556 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | A523 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | Single-Core | 796 | 279 | Multi-Core | 3186 | 1228 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | A523 |
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 | Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2100 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 8 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | DDR3/DDR3L/DDR4/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 32-bit 4Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4 up to 2400MHz, 1x LPDDR3 up to 933MHz | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 1 MB | 64 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 16 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Octa 7885 is 14% better than A523 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC1 2EE | Mali-G71 MP18 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 546 MHz | GFloPS | 540 | 334 | # of Cores | 3 | 18 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 21.4 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 26.5 | 26.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 56.9 | 37.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 29.5 | 34.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 23.8 | 25.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 32.7 | 37.7 | Real Racing 3 | 98.9 | 65.3 | Sniper 3D | 73.8 | 48.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 79.9 | 67.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 73.7 | 42.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 79.3 | 44.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 28 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 28 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | LTE Cat.13 3CA | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Allwinner A523 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 is better: 11 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
A523 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Exynos 7 Octa 7885 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|