 |
Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 |
|
Comparisons 08-10-2023 Comprehensive comparison data of Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like AnTuTu, Geekbench, GFXBench, Neocore, Vellamo, 3DMark, Quadrant, PCMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy Tensor G3 or Dimensity 8300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTensor G3 | 76% |
Dimensity 8300 | 74% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tensor G3 | 86% |
Dimensity 8300 | 87% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTensor G3 | 73% |
Dimensity 8300 | 72% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tensor G3 |
Dimensity 8300 | Total score | 1071317 | 1035505 | CPU | 299978 | 289949 | GPU | 407100 | 393482 | MEM | 171402 | 165670 | UX | 192844 | 186390 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tensor G3 |
Dimensity 8300 | Single-Core | 1403 | 1184 | Multi-Core | 3849 | 4305 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tensor G3 |
Dimensity 8300 | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | | 8800 millions | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 4x2.34 GHz Cortex-A715 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-X3 3x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A714 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 7500 | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 | 52 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 32 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tensor G3 is 6% better than Dimensity 8300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G715 MP9 | Mali-G52 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 1354.62 | 426 | # of Cores | 9 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 40.3 | 39.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 126.1 | 122.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 76.2 | 73.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 69.9 | 67.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 109.5 | 104.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 156.3 | 151.2 | Real Racing 3 | 152.6 | 147.5 | Sniper 3D | 166.8 | 162.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 106.8 | 102.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 109.7 | 105.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 91.8 | 88.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 360 MP | 320 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, AV1 BigWave | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Exynos Modem 5223 | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 10150 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 9500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, Galileo, NavIC enabled, QZSS, GLONASS, GNSS, NavIC, Beidou, SBAS | NavIC, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor G3 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8300 is better: 10 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Tensor G3 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Dimensity 8300 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|