Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200

Comparisons 08-10-2023

Full comparison data of Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Neocore, Geekbench, GFXBench, Vellamo, 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PassMark, PCMark, and how good the processors are in games Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chipset is better to buy Tensor G3 or Dimensity 9200.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Tensor G3

76%

Dimensity 9200

91%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Tensor G3

86%

Dimensity 9200

84%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Tensor G3

73%

Dimensity 9200

89%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Tensor G3	Dimensity 9200
Total score	1071317	1268278
CPU	299978	355109
GPU	407100	481953
MEM	171402	202930
UX	192844	228299

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Tensor G3	Dimensity 9200
Single-Core	1403	1450
Multi-Core	3849	5272

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Tensor G3	Dimensity 9200
Frequency	3000 MHz	3000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	4 nm
Transistors count		9200 millions
Core configuration	1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 4x2.34 GHz Cortex-A715 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510	1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-X3 3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)	LPDDR5x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	3200	7500
Memory bandwidth	51.2	52
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L2 cache	2 MB	8 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G715 MP9	Immortalis-G715 MC16
GPU Frequency	750 MHz	750 MHz
GFloPS	1354.62	3200
# of Cores	9	16
# of Shader Units
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	40.3	48.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	126.1	150.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	76.2	90.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	69.9	83.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	109.5	128.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	156.3	185.4
Real Racing 3	152.6	180.1
Sniper 3D	166.8	198.7
Need for Speed No Limits	106.8	125.7
Mortal Kombat X	109.7	130.3
CSR Racing 2	91.8	108.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	360 MP	320 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP
Video Encoding FPS	60	240
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, AV1 BigWave	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5223	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	10150 MBit/s.	7500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	9500 MBit/s.	3100 MBit/s.
Navigation	Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, Galileo, NavIC enabled, QZSS, GLONASS, GNSS, NavIC, Beidou, SBAS	Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor G3 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9200 is better: 28
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Tensor G3 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tensor G3 specs and review.

Dimensity 9200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 9200 specs and review.