 |
Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 |
|
Comparisons 08-10-2023 Comprehensive testing data of Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, Neocore, GeekBench 6, GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, Antutu v10, 9, and how good the chipsets are in games Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, Madout2, GTA etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Tensor G3 or MediaTek Dimensity 7050.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTensor G3 | 76% |
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | 40% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tensor G3 | 86% |
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | 83% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTensor G3 | 73% |
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | 37% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tensor G3 |
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | Total score | 1071317 | 617016 | CPU | 299978 | 172759 | GPU | 407100 | 234461 | MEM | 171402 | 98726 | UX | 192844 | 111058 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tensor G3 |
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | Single-Core | 1403 | 989 | Multi-Core | 3849 | 3441 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tensor G3 |
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 4x2.34 GHz Cortex-A715 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510 | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tensor G3 is 13% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7050 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G715 MP9 | Mali-G68 MC4 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 1354.62 | 686 | # of Cores | 9 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | 128 | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 40.3 | 28.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 126.1 | 69.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 76.2 | 95.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 69.9 | 53.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 109.5 | 59.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 156.3 | 87.4 | Real Racing 3 | 152.6 | 191.4 | Sniper 3D | 166.8 | 210.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 106.8 | 153.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 109.7 | 153.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 91.8 | 134.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 360 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, AV1 BigWave | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Exynos Modem 5223 | 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 10150 MBit/s. | 3500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 9500 MBit/s. | 2000 MBit/s. | Navigation | Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, Galileo, NavIC enabled, QZSS, GLONASS, GNSS, NavIC, Beidou, SBAS | NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor G3 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7050 is better: 11 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Tensor G3 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|