 |
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|
Processor comparisons 12-01-2022 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, machine learning, video editing, programming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like MATLAB, PCMark 10, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Blender, Furmark, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, Prime95, AIDA64, WPrime, Handbrake. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X or AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 5 6600HS | 57% |
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 58% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1% better than Ryzen 5 6600HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 5 6600HS | 54% |
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 58% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.3 | 102.9 | Valorant | 109.4 | 116.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 65.5 | Apex Legends | 102.9 | 109.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.1 | 87.7 | Overwatch | 88.6 | 94.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 80.7 | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 58.5 | Warzone | 85.4 | 91.2 | Assassin's Creed | 91.9 | 98.2 | Valheim | 90.8 | 97.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 5 6600HS | 139% |
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 19% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 6600HS is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 180W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 228 | 168 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2261 | 2986 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 540 | 411 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4963 | 6731 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1405 | 1035 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12636 | 18780 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Single-Core | 3016 | 2253 | Multi-Core | 24991 | 26588 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Single-Core | 1464 | 1053 | Multi-Core | 8133 | 14599 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Announcement date | January 09, 2022 | July 31, 2017 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FP7 | sTR4 | Core name | Rembrandt | Whitehaven | Architecture | Zen 3+ | Zen | Generation | 6 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 6 | 16 | Threads | 12 | 32 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 10200 millions | 11600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 180 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 2667 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | 384KB | 1.5MB | L2 cache | 3MB | 8MB | L3 cache | 16MB | 32MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | FP7:100-000000546 FP7r2:100-000000562
| YD195XA8UGAAE YD195XA8AEWOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2% better than Ryzen 5 6600HS in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 10 more core than Ryzen 5 6600HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS is better: 12
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is better: 23 However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-13700H
| |
|