|
Intel Core i9-13900HK vs Intel Core i5-12500H |
|
Processor comparisons 13-11-2022 If you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-13900HK vs Intel Core i5-12500H and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing, rendering. Here you can find useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Furmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, RealBench, 7zip, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Prime95, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Handbrake, WPrime, PassMark, MATLAB, 3DMark, VeraCrypt. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-12500H or Intel Core i9-13900HK.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13900HK | 58% |
Core i5-12500H | 57% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900HK is 1% better than Core i5-12500H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13900HK | 57% |
Core i5-12500H | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.6 | 98.6 | Valorant | 115.4 | 112.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.6 | 62.7 | Apex Legends | 108.5 | 105.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.6 | 84.0 | Overwatch | 93.5 | 90.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.6 | 77.3 | DOOM Eternal | 57.7 | 56.0 | Warzone | 90.0 | 87.4 | Assassin's Creed | 96.9 | 94.1 | Valheim | 95.8 | 93.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13900HK | 134% |
Core i5-12500H | 143% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-12500H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900HK as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 40W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900HK |
Intel Core i5-12500H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 282 | 312 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2730 | 2282 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 455 | 748 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6039 | 5183 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1546 | 1749 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17328 | 17085 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900HK |
Intel Core i5-12500H | Single-Core | 1415 | 4099 | Multi-Core | 29517 | 23919 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900HK |
Intel Core i5-12500H | Single-Core | 1812 | 1721 | Multi-Core | 13291 | 10346 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-13900HK |
Intel Core i5-12500H | Announcement date | November 12, 2022 | January 07, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1744 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 14 | 12 | Threads | 20 | 16 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 10200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 40 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 32 MB | 18 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-12500H is 15% better than Core i9-13900HK in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900HK has 2 more core than Core i5-12500H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900HK is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-12500H is better: 7 Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-13900HK and Intel Core i5-12500H before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13900HK Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Intel Core i5-12500H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Celeron N5105 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|