|
Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i5-12500H |
|
Processor comparisons 02-02-2023 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i5-12500H tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Prime95, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Blender, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, MATLAB, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, WPrime, PassMark, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-12500H or Intel Core i9-13900H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13900H | 59% |
Core i5-12500H | 57% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900H is 3% better than Core i5-12500H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13900H | 58% |
Core i5-12500H | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 103.4 | 98.6 | Valorant | 117.5 | 112.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.8 | 62.7 | Apex Legends | 110.4 | 105.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.1 | 84.0 | Overwatch | 95.2 | 90.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.1 | 77.3 | DOOM Eternal | 58.7 | 56.0 | Warzone | 91.6 | 87.4 | Assassin's Creed | 98.7 | 94.1 | Valheim | 97.5 | 93.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13900H | 139% |
Core i5-12500H | 143% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-12500H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 40W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i5-12500H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 310 | 312 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2979 | 2282 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 499 | 748 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6586 | 5183 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1688 | 1749 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18891 | 17085 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i5-12500H | Single-Core | 1545 | 4099 | Multi-Core | 32177 | 23919 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i5-12500H | Single-Core | 1884 | 1721 | Multi-Core | 15080 | 10346 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13900H |
Intel Core i5-12500H | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1744 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 14 | 12 | Threads | 20 | 16 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 10200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 40 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 18 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900H is 19% better than Core i5-12500H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900H has 2 more core than Core i5-12500H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900H is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-12500H is better: 6 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13900H and Intel Core i5-12500H before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-13900H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i5-12500H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Celeron N5105 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|