 |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Intel Core i5-12500H |
|
Processor comparisons 15-02-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Intel Core i5-12500H tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, 7zip, WPrime, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, AIDA64, 3DMark, Prime95, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, Blender, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-12500H or AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | 59% |
Core i5-12500H | 57% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 7 7840HS is 3% better than Core i5-12500H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 7 7840HS | 57% |
Core i5-12500H | 55% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 100.5 | 98.6 | | Valorant | 114.2 | 112.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.0 | 62.7 | | Apex Legends | 107.4 | 105.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.7 | 84.0 | | Overwatch | 92.5 | 90.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.8 | 77.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.1 | 56.0 | | Warzone | 89.1 | 87.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 96.0 | 94.1 | | Valheim | 94.8 | 93.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | 156% |
Core i5-12500H | 143% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 7840HS is more energy efficient than the Core i5-12500H as it consumes less power: 40W vs. 40W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
Intel Core i5-12500H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 211 | 312 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2865 | 2282 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 452 | 748 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6799 | 5183 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1095 | 1749 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18618 | 17085 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
Intel Core i5-12500H | | Single-Core | 2275 | 4099 | | Multi-Core | 30003 | 23919 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
Intel Core i5-12500H | | Single-Core | 1876 | 1721 | | Multi-Core | 12274 | 10346 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
Intel Core i5-12500H | | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP7r2;FP7;FP8 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Phoenix | Alder Lake | | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 MHz | 4.5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 12 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 13400 millions | 10200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 40 W | 40 W | | Memory type | DDR5 (FP7r2)
LPDDR5/x (FP7, FP8) | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 256 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 512KB | | | L2 cache | 8MB | | | L3 cache | 16MB | 18 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000955 (FP7r2)
100-000000964 (FP7)
100-000001129 (FP8)
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 7 7840HS is 13% better than Core i5-12500H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-12500H has 4 more core than Ryzen 7 7840HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-12500H is better: 9
Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS and Intel Core i5-12500H before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i5-12500H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Celeron N5105
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
