|
Apple M1 Max vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|
Processor comparisons 21-10-2022 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Apple M1 Max vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, rendering, programming, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, WPrime, 7zip, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, Gears 5, Furmark, PassMark, Blender, 3DMark, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, AIDA64, SuperPi, Blender, RealBench. Gaming performance of processors in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS or Apple M1 Max.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M1 Max | 60% |
Ryzen 7 6800HS | 57% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M1 Max is 5% better than Ryzen 7 6800HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M1 Max | 57% |
Ryzen 7 6800HS | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.3 | 96.6 | Valorant | 115.1 | 109.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 61.5 | Apex Legends | 108.2 | 103.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.3 | 82.4 | Overwatch | 93.2 | 88.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.4 | 75.8 | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 54.9 | Warzone | 89.8 | 85.7 | Assassin's Creed | 96.7 | 92.2 | Valheim | 95.5 | 91.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M1 Max | 332% |
Ryzen 7 6800HS | 144% | To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Max is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 7 6800HS as it consumes less power: 18W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M1 Max |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 313 | 230 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1811 | 2348 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 617 | 555 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3106 | 5163 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2360 | 1456 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12204 | 13156 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Max |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS | Single-Core | 5344 | 3134 | Multi-Core | 34572 | 26025 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Max |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS | Single-Core | 1793 | 1518 | Multi-Core | 13028 | 8464 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Apple M1 Max |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS | Announcement date | October 07, 2021 | January 09, 2022 | Type | Laptop;Desktop | Laptop | Socket | M1 | FP7 | Core name | 8x Firestorm and 2x Icestorm | Rembrandt | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Zen 3+ | Generation | 1 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | | 4.7 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 10 | 8 | Threads | 10 | 16 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | 57000 millions | 10200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 18 W | 35 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | DDR5 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 409 GByte/s | | L1 cache | 4MB | 512KB | L2 cache | 24MB | 4MB | L3 cache | 48MB | 16MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | APL1105 | FP7:100-000000545 FP7r7:100-000000561
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that M1 Max has 2 more core than Ryzen 7 6800HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Max is better: 26
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is better: 9 However, it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Apple M1 Max and AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Apple M1 Max Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|