 |
Apple M1 Max vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R |
|
Processor comparisons 21-10-2022 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Apple M1 Max vs Intel Xeon Gold 6248R and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, rendering, video editing, programming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like UserBenchmark, Furmark, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, PCMark 10, 7zip, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Prime95, RealBench, PassMark, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Blender, WPrime, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of processors in: - Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6248R or Apple M1 Max.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M1 Max | 60% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 61% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon Gold 6248R is 1% better than M1 Max. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M1 Max | 57% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 70% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.3 | 124.8 | Valorant | 115.1 | 141.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 79.4 | Apex Legends | 108.2 | 133.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.3 | 106.4 | Overwatch | 93.2 | 114.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.4 | 97.9 | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 70.9 | Warzone | 89.8 | 110.6 | Assassin's Creed | 96.7 | 119.1 | Valheim | 95.5 | 117.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M1 Max | 332% |
Xeon Gold 6248R | 16% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Max is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 6248R since it has less power consumption: 18W vs. 205W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M1 Max |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 313 | 226 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1811 | 6636 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 617 | 426 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3106 | 10753 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2360 | 1080 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12204 | 27371 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Max |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Single-Core | 5344 | 2247 | Multi-Core | 34572 | 38405 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Max |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Single-Core | 1793 | 990 | Multi-Core | 13028 | 36095 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Apple M1 Max |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R | Announcement date | October 07, 2021 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop;Desktop | Server | Socket | M1 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | 8x Firestorm and 2x Icestorm | Cascade Lake | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | x86 | Generation | 1 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 10 | 24 | Threads | 10 | 48 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 57000 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 18 W | 205 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 409 GByte/s | | L1 cache | 4MB | | L2 cache | 24MB | | L3 cache | 48MB | 35.75 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | APL1105 | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 Max is 6% better than Xeon Gold 6248R in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Gold 6248R has 14 more core than M1 Max. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Max is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6248R is better: 21 Although it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Apple M1 Max and Intel Xeon Gold 6248R before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Apple M1 Max Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|