|
Apple M1 Max vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|
Processor comparisons 21-10-2022 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Apple M1 Max vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, machine learning, programming, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as UserBenchmark, Blender, PCMark 10, MATLAB, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Gears 5, WPrime, SuperPi, RealBench, Furmark, Prime95, 3DMark, 7zip. Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS or Apple M1 Max.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M1 Max | 60% |
Ryzen 9 6900HS | 58% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M1 Max is 3% better than Ryzen 9 6900HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M1 Max | 57% |
Ryzen 9 6900HS | 55% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Control, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.3 | 97.1 | Valorant | 115.1 | 110.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 61.8 | Apex Legends | 108.2 | 103.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.3 | 82.7 | Overwatch | 93.2 | 89.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.4 | 76.1 | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 55.2 | Warzone | 89.8 | 86.1 | Assassin's Creed | 96.7 | 92.7 | Valheim | 95.5 | 91.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M1 Max | 332% |
Ryzen 9 6900HS | 152% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Max is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 9 6900HS since it has less power consumption: 18W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M1 Max |
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 313 | 247 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1811 | 2476 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 617 | 590 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3106 | 5437 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2360 | 1538 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12204 | 13848 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Max |
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | Single-Core | 5344 | 3303 | Multi-Core | 34572 | 27389 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Max |
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | Single-Core | 1793 | 1602 | Multi-Core | 13028 | 8911 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Apple M1 Max |
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | Announcement date | October 07, 2021 | January 09, 2022 | Type | Laptop;Desktop | Laptop | Socket | M1 | FP7 | Core name | 8x Firestorm and 2x Icestorm | Rembrandt | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Zen 3+ | Generation | 1 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | | 4.9 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 10 | 8 | Threads | 10 | 16 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | 57000 millions | 10200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 18 W | 35 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | DDR5 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 409 GByte/s | | L1 cache | 4MB | 512KB | L2 cache | 24MB | 4MB | L3 cache | 48MB | 16MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | APL1105 | FP7:100-000000545 FP7r7:100-000000561
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 9 6900HS is 3% better than M1 Max in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M1 Max has 2 more core than Ryzen 9 6900HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Max is better: 26
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS is better: 10 However, it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Apple M1 Max and AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Apple M1 Max Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|