|
Apple M1 Max vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS |
|
Processor comparisons 21-10-2022 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Apple M1 Max vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as PCMark 10, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Gears 5, 7zip, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, RealBench, SuperPi, 3DMark, Blender, WPrime, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, PassMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Fortnite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS or Apple M1 Max.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
M1 Max | 60% |
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | 58% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M1 Max is 3% better than Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.M1 Max | 57% |
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Monster Hunter World, Control, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.3 | 96.7 | Valorant | 115.1 | 109.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 61.5 | Apex Legends | 108.2 | 103.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.3 | 82.4 | Overwatch | 93.2 | 89.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.4 | 75.8 | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 54.9 | Warzone | 89.8 | 85.7 | Assassin's Creed | 96.7 | 92.3 | Valheim | 95.5 | 91.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M1 Max | 332% |
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | 121% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Max is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS since it has less power consumption: 18W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M1 Max |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 313 | 265 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1811 | 2557 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 617 | 615 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3106 | 5607 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2360 | 1527 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 12204 | 15603 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Max |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | Single-Core | 5344 | 3409 | Multi-Core | 34572 | 28207 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Max |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | Single-Core | 1793 | 1279 | Multi-Core | 13028 | 8537 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Apple M1 Max |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS | Announcement date | October 07, 2021 | January 07, 2022 | Type | Laptop;Desktop | Laptop | Socket | M1 | FP7 | Core name | 8x Firestorm and 2x Icestorm | Rembrandt | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Zen 3+ | Generation | 1 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | | 4.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 10 | 6 | Threads | 10 | 12 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | 57000 millions | 7200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 18 W | 35 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | DDR5 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 409 GByte/s | | L1 cache | 4MB | 384KB | L2 cache | 24MB | 3MB | L3 cache | 48MB | 16MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | APL1105 | FP7: 100-000000543 FP7r2:100-000000565
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS is 3% better than M1 Max in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M1 Max has 4 more core than Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Max is better: 27
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS is better: 9 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Apple M1 Max and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Apple M1 Max Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|