Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 9174F vs AMD EPYC 7F72 gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 9174F vs AMD EPYC 7F72

Processor comparisons   11-03-2023
   If you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 9174F vs AMD EPYC 7F72 and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing, rendering. Here you can find useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Furmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, RealBench, 7zip, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Prime95, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Handbrake, WPrime, PassMark, MATLAB, 3DMark, VeraCrypt.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Valheim
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • Last Man Standing
  • Fallout 76
  • Overwatch
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Borderlands 3
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Fortnite
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Death Stranding
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Valorant
  • Halo Infinite
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Apex Legends

   After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7F72 or AMD EPYC 9174F.


 
AMD EPYC 9174F
AMD EPYC 7F72

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9174F66% EPYC 7F7267%
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7F72 is 1% better than EPYC 9174F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 9174F70% EPYC 7F7271%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite123.8126.7
Valorant140.7143.9
Cyberpunk 207778.880.6
Apex Legends132.2135.3
Call of Duty Warzone105.5107.9
Overwatch113.9116.6
Red Dead Redemption 297.199.3
DOOM Eternal70.372.0
Warzone109.7112.3
Assassin's Creed118.2120.9
Valheim116.7119.5
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 9174F18% EPYC 7F7216%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9174F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7F72 since it has less power consumption: 320W vs. 240W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

For example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 9174F AMD EPYC 7F72
Cinbench 15 Single-core134172
Cinbench 15 Multi-core67226991
Cinbench 20 Single-core277322
Cinbench 20 Multi-core1427914814
Cinbench 23 Single-core727786
Cinbench 23 Multi-core3717938516

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 9174F AMD EPYC 7F72
Single-Core16721763
Multi-Core5454956496

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 9174F AMD EPYC 7F72
Single-Core17811159
Multi-Core3508137901

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!

AMD EPYC 9174F AMD EPYC 7F72
Announcement dateNovember 10, 2022April 14, 2020
TypeServerServer
SocketSP5SP3
Core nameGenoaRome
ArchitectureZen 4Zen 2
Generation42
Turbo Frequency4.4 MHz3.7 MHz
Frequency4.1 MHz3.2 MHz
Cores1624
Threads3248
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography5 nm7 nm
Transistors count64000 millions62000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)320 W240 W
Memory typeDDR5DDR4
Max. Memory4096 Gb4096 Gb
Memory Frequency48003200
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache256MB192MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCYesNo
Part number100-000000796
100-100000796WOF
100-000000141
100-000000141WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9174F is 21% better than EPYC 7F72 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7F72 has 8 more core than EPYC 9174F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9174F is better: 10
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F72 is better: 23
   However, it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 9174F and AMD EPYC 7F72 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9174F - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 7F72 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 9174F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 7F72 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands