 |
AMD EPYC 7252 vs AMD EPYC 7F72 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7252 vs AMD EPYC 7F72 and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, WPrime, UserBenchmark, RealBench, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, Prime95, AIDA64, SuperPi, 3DMark, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, Gears 5, PCMark 10, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip.
And how good the processors are in games: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7F72 or AMD EPYC 7252.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7252 | 55% |
EPYC 7F72 | 67% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7F72 is 17% better than EPYC 7252. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7252 | 58% |
EPYC 7F72 | 71% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 103.4 | 126.7 | | Valorant | 117.5 | 143.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.8 | 80.6 | | Apex Legends | 110.4 | 135.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.1 | 107.9 | | Overwatch | 95.1 | 116.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.0 | 99.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 58.7 | 72.0 | | Warzone | 91.6 | 112.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 98.7 | 120.9 | | Valheim | 97.5 | 119.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7252 | 27% |
EPYC 7F72 | 16% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7252 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7F72 as it consumes less power: 120W vs. 240W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7252 |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 242 | 172 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1856 | 6991 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 433 | 322 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4126 | 14814 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1482 | 786 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11071 | 38516 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7252 |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | | Single-Core | 1615 | 1763 | | Multi-Core | 19724 | 56496 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7252 |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | | Single-Core | 1001 | 1159 | | Multi-Core | 15066 | 37901 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7252 |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 14, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Rome | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 2 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 24 | | Threads | 16 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 42000 millions | 62000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 120 W | 240 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 85 GByte/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 64MB | 192MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000080
100-100000080WOF | 100-000000141
100-000000141WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7F72 is 3% better than EPYC 7252 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7F72 has 16 more core than EPYC 7252. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7252 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F72 is better: 25
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7252 and AMD EPYC 7F72 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7252 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7F72 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
