 |
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U vs AMD EPYC 7F72 |
|
Processor comparisons 29-03-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U vs AMD EPYC 7F72 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing, rendering. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Blender, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, WPrime, 3DMark, SuperPi, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, Furmark, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, MATLAB.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7F72 or Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Xeon Bronze 3408U | 52% |
EPYC 7F72 | 67% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7F72 is 22% better than Xeon Bronze 3408U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Xeon Bronze 3408U | 54% |
EPYC 7F72 | 71% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.0 | 126.7 | | Valorant | 109.1 | 143.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.1 | 80.6 | | Apex Legends | 102.6 | 135.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.8 | 107.9 | | Overwatch | 88.4 | 116.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.3 | 99.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.6 | 72.0 | | Warzone | 85.1 | 112.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.6 | 120.9 | | Valheim | 90.6 | 119.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Xeon Bronze 3408U | 20% |
EPYC 7F72 | 16% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Bronze 3408U is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7F72 as it consumes less power: 125W vs. 240W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 161 | 172 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 759 | 6991 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 388 | 322 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1693 | 14814 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 957 | 786 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4251 | 38516 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | | Single-Core | 122 | 1763 | | Multi-Core | 8325 | 56496 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | | Single-Core | 786 | 1159 | | Multi-Core | 7851 | 37901 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | | Announcement date | March 23, 2023 | April 14, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | FCLGA4677 | SP3 | | Core name | Sapphire Rapids | Rome | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 1.8 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 24 | | Threads | 8 | 48 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 36000 millions | 62000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 240 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4000 MT/s 1DPC and 2DPC | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 22.5 MB | 192MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | 100-000000141
100-000000141WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7F72 is 43% better than Xeon Bronze 3408U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7F72 has 16 more core than Xeon Bronze 3408U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U is better: 8
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F72 is better: 26
However, it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U and AMD EPYC 7F72 before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7F72 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
