 |
AMD EPYC 7232P vs AMD EPYC 9474F |
|
Processor comparisons 15-03-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7232P vs AMD EPYC 9474F and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, Gears 5, WPrime, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, AIDA64, Handbrake, Blender, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Blender.
Gaming performance of processors in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Valheim
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9474F or AMD EPYC 7232P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7232P | 55% |
EPYC 9474F | 77% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9474F is 28% better than EPYC 7232P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7232P | 55% |
EPYC 9474F | 85% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.8 | 150.1 | | Valorant | 110.0 | 170.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.6 | 95.5 | | Apex Legends | 103.4 | 160.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.5 | 127.9 | | Overwatch | 89.1 | 138.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.9 | 117.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 55.0 | 85.3 | | Warzone | 85.8 | 133.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 92.4 | 143.3 | | Valheim | 91.3 | 141.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7232P | 26% |
EPYC 9474F | 16% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7232P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9474F as it consumes less power: 120W vs. 360W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7232P |
AMD EPYC 9474F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 211 | 246 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1570 | 11139 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 372 | 484 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3480 | 23633 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1255 | 1229 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 9326 | 61496 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7232P |
AMD EPYC 9474F | | Single-Core | 1367 | 2790 | | Multi-Core | 16608 | 90217 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7232P |
AMD EPYC 9474F | | Single-Core | 965 | 1762 | | Multi-Core | 8637 | 60869 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7232P |
AMD EPYC 9474F | | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 48 | | Threads | 16 | 96 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 42000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 120 W | 360 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 85 GByte/s | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 32MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000081
100-100000081WOF | 100-000000788
100-000000788WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9474F is 13% better than EPYC 7232P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9474F has 40 more core than EPYC 7232P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7232P is better: 4
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9474F is better: 30
Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7232P and AMD EPYC 9474F before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7232P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9474F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
