 |
AMD EPYC 9474F vs Intel Xeon E-2234 |
|
Processor comparisons 15-03-2023 For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 9474F vs Intel Xeon E-2234 and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, rendering, machine learning, video editing, programming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like PCMark 10, 7zip, Prime95, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Blender, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Fortnite
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon E-2234 or AMD EPYC 9474F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9474F | 77% |
Xeon E-2234 | 52% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9474F is 32% better than Xeon E-2234. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9474F | 85% |
Xeon E-2234 | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 150.1 | 93.6 | Valorant | 170.6 | 106.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 95.5 | 59.6 | Apex Legends | 160.3 | 100.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 127.9 | 79.8 | Overwatch | 138.1 | 86.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 117.7 | 73.4 | DOOM Eternal | 85.3 | 53.2 | Warzone | 133.0 | 83.0 | Assassin's Creed | 143.3 | 89.3 | Valheim | 141.6 | 88.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9474F | 16% |
Xeon E-2234 | 61% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon E-2234 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9474F since it has less power consumption: 360W vs. 71W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9474F |
Intel Xeon E-2234 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 246 | 221 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 11139 | 686 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 484 | 476 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 23633 | 1671 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1229 | 335 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 61496 | 9453 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9474F |
Intel Xeon E-2234 | Single-Core | 2790 | 2945 | Multi-Core | 90217 | 9621 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9474F |
Intel Xeon E-2234 | Single-Core | 1762 | 1300 | Multi-Core | 60869 | 5490 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9474F |
Intel Xeon E-2234 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | FCLGA1151-2 | Core name | Genoa | Coffee Lake | Architecture | Zen 4 | x86 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 48 | 4 | Threads | 96 | 8 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 28500 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 360 W | 71 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000788 100-000000788WOF | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that EPYC 9474F has 44 more core than Xeon E-2234. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9474F is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon E-2234 is better: 5 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9474F and Intel Xeon E-2234 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9474F Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Intel Xeon E-2234 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|