|
Apple A12Z Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks Apple A12Z Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G, comparison of GPUs Adreno 619 and Apple A12Z Bionic. This performance comparison includes two processors: A12Z Bionic is octa-core (Vortex) and Snapdragon 750G is octa-core (Kryo 570). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as GFXBench, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Vellamo, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, PassMark, Geekbench, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy A12Z Bionic or Snapdragon 750G and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreA12Z Bionic | 52% |
Snapdragon 750G | 23% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)A12Z Bionic | 72% |
Snapdragon 750G | 76% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingA12Z Bionic | 49% |
Snapdragon 750G | 21% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | A12Z Bionic |
Snapdragon 750G | Total score | 729707 | 324969 | CPU | 204317 | 90989 | GPU | 277290 | 123496 | MEM | 116753 | 51999 | UX | 131357 | 58484 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | A12Z Bionic |
Snapdragon 750G | Single-Core | 1332 | 727 | Multi-Core | 4661 | 2475 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | A12Z Bionic |
Snapdragon 750G | Frequency | 2490 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 10000 millions | | Core configuration | 4x2.49GHz Vortex 4x1.6 GHz Tempest | 8x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 42 | 17 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 48 KB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.3-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A12Z Bionic is 11% better than Snapdragon 750G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Apple A12Z Bionic | Adreno 619 | GPU Frequency | 2500 MHz | 950 MHz | GFloPS | 1486 | 712 | # of Cores | 8 | | # of Shader Units | | 320 | Display | 2732 x 2048 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.8 | 27.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 86.5 | 57.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 52.4 | 62.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 48.4 | 39.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 74.9 | 50.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 107.7 | 77.8 | Real Racing 3 | 104.8 | 110.1 | Sniper 3D | 115.3 | 138.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 62.9 | 75.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 83.8 | 100.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 68.1 | 69.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 12 MP | 192 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 12 MP | 48 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Apple ISP | Qualcomm Spectra 355L | Video Encoding FPS | 960 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10, HLG |
Networks and NavigationModem | Intel XMM 7560 LTE | Qualcomm Snapdragon X52 Modem-RF System | Download speed | 1000 MBit/s. | 3700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 350 MBit/s. | 1200 MBit/s. | Navigation | Beidou, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | NavIC, GNSS, GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, QZSS, SBAS, Beidou, Galileo | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G is better: 13 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs A12Z Bionic and Snapdragon 750G, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
A12Z Bionic SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Apple A12Z Bionic Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Snapdragon 750G SoC Comparisons • Vs Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Dimensity 800U • Vs Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Dimensity 800 • Vs Snapdragon 768G • Vs Kirin 980 • Vs Exynos 9825 • Vs Kirin 820 5G • Vs Dimensity 820 • Vs A12 Bionic • Vs Kirin 985 • Vs Dimensity 1000C • Vs Kirin 990E • Vs Kirin 990 5G • Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Exynos 990 • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Dimensity 1000L • Vs A14 Bionic • Vs Snapdragon 865 • Vs Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Helio G95 • Vs Snapdragon 765G • Vs Snapdragon 855 • Vs Snapdragon 732G • Vs Helio G90 • Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Helio G90T • Vs Tiger T710 • Vs Kirin 810 • Vs Tiger T7510 • Vs Tiger T7520 • Vs Exynos 980 • Vs Helio G85 • Vs Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Exynos 9810 • Vs Helio G80 • Vs Tiger T618 • Vs Snapdragon 730G • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
| |
|