|
MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G |
|
Comparisons 31-08-2022 Full compare data of MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, Vellamo, Neocore, PCMark, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Madout2 etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chip is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 820 or Snapdragon 750G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Kompanio 820 | 31% |
Snapdragon 750G | 23% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Kompanio 820 | 78% |
Snapdragon 750G | 76% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Kompanio 820 | 29% |
Snapdragon 750G | 21% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Kompanio 820 |
Snapdragon 750G | Total score | 434348 | 324969 | CPU | 121620 | 90989 | GPU | 165046 | 123496 | MEM | 69495 | 51999 | UX | 78182 | 58484 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Kompanio 820 |
Snapdragon 750G | Single-Core | 662 | 727 | Multi-Core | 2622 | 2475 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Kompanio 820 |
Snapdragon 750G | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 17 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.3-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP5 | Adreno 619 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 950 MHz | GFloPS | 705.5 | 712 | # of Cores | 5 | | # of Shader Units | | 320 | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.6 | 27.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 54.7 | 57.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 56.9 | 62.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 41.4 | 39.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 48.3 | 50.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 73.9 | 77.8 | Real Racing 3 | 71.5 | 110.1 | Sniper 3D | 124.7 | 138.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 79.4 | 75.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 81.6 | 100.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 62.7 | 69.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 192 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 48 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 355L | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10, HLG |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X52 Modem-RF System | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 3700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1800 MBit/s. | 1200 MBit/s. | Navigation | Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5 | NavIC, GNSS, GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, QZSS, SBAS, Beidou, Galileo | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 820 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G is better: 18 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek Kompanio 820 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Snapdragon 750G SoC Comparisons • Vs Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Dimensity 800U • Vs Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Dimensity 800 • Vs Snapdragon 768G • Vs Kirin 980 • Vs Exynos 9825 • Vs Kirin 820 5G • Vs Dimensity 820 • Vs A12 Bionic • Vs Kirin 985 • Vs Dimensity 1000C • Vs Kirin 990E • Vs Kirin 990 5G • Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Exynos 990 • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Dimensity 1000L • Vs A14 Bionic • Vs Snapdragon 865 • Vs Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Helio G95 • Vs Snapdragon 765G • Vs Snapdragon 855 • Vs Snapdragon 732G • Vs Helio G90 • Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Helio G90T • Vs Tiger T710 • Vs Kirin 810 • Vs Tiger T7510 • Vs Tiger T7520 • Vs Exynos 980 • Vs Helio G85 • Vs Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Exynos 9810 • Vs Helio G80 • Vs Tiger T618 • Vs Snapdragon 730G • Vs Snapdragon 720G • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
| |
|