HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G, compare of GPUs Mali-G57 MP6 and Adreno 619.

This performance comparison involves two processors: HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A76) and Snapdragon 750G is octa-core (Kryo 570). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Octane V2, Neocore, Vellamo, 3DMark, Geekbench, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G or Snapdragon 750G and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G

24%

Snapdragon 750G

23%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G

78%

Snapdragon 750G

76%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G

21%

Snapdragon 750G

21%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G	Snapdragon 750G
Total score	345831	324969
CPU	96840	90989
GPU	131412	123496
MEM	55325	51999
UX	62245	58484

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G	Snapdragon 750G
Single-Core	746	727
Multi-Core	2536	2475

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G	Snapdragon 750G
Frequency	2360 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	6	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	3x2.22 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x1.84 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	8x2.2 GHz Kryo 570
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	12 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	2133
Memory bandwidth	31.78	17
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.3-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G is 6% better than Snapdragon 750G in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G has 2 more core than Snapdragon 750G. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MP6	Adreno 619
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	846	712
# of Cores	6
# of Shader Units		320
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.3	27.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	57.8	57.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	47.7	62.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	43.8	39.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	47.9	50.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	74.5	77.8
Real Racing 3	95.4	110.1
Sniper 3D	104.9	138.4
Need for Speed No Limits	76.3	75.5
Mortal Kombat X	76.3	100.6
CSR Racing 2	62	69.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	48 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	24 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 355L
Video Encoding FPS	60	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10, HLG

Networks and Navigation

Modem	21	Qualcomm Snapdragon X52 Modem-RF System
Download speed	7350 MBit/s.	3700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3400 MBit/s.	1200 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	NavIC, GNSS, GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, QZSS, SBAS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G is better: 16
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G specs and review.

Snapdragon 750G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 750G specs and review.