|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 |
|
Comparisons 01-11-2024 Full comparison data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like 3DMark, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 8 Elite or Snapdragon 875.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 8 Elite | 100% |
Snapdragon 875 | 64% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 8 Elite | 88% |
Snapdragon 875 | 79% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 8 Elite | 98% |
Snapdragon 875 | 61% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
Snapdragon 875 | Total score | 3123644 | 892580 | CPU | 874624 | 249924 | GPU | 1186984 | 339178 | MEM | 499774 | 142802 | UX | 562252 | 160655 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
Snapdragon 875 | Single-Core | 3395 | 1404 | Multi-Core | 10489 | 4904 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
Snapdragon 875 | Frequency | 4320 MHz | 2840 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 14000 millions | | Core configuration | 2x4.32 GHz Oryon (Phoenix L) 6x3.53 GHz Oryon (Phoenix M) | 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 5300 | 2750 | Memory bandwidth | 92 | 51.2 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 32 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 8 Elite is 34% better than Snapdragon 875 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 660 | GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 3382 | 1486 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 3072 | 512 | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 116.6 | 34.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 372.6 | 105.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 220.1 | 63.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 205.1 | 58.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 314.4 | 90.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 454.5 | 130.5 | Real Racing 3 | 444.4 | 126.8 | Sniper 3D | 485.2 | 139.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 309.7 | 88.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 321.3 | 91.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 265.5 | 76.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 320 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 240 MP | 36 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 770 | Qualcomm Spectra 480 | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X80 Modem-RF System 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X57 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 10000 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 6000 MBit/s. | Navigation | GNSS, QZSS, GPS, NavIC, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, NavIC enabled | Beidou, NavIC enabled, SBAS, GPS, GNSS, Galileo, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite is better: 35
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 is better: 4 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Snapdragon 875 SoC Comparisons • Vs A12Z Bionic • Vs Snapdragon 888 • Vs Kirin 9000 • Vs Kirin 9000E • Vs Exynos 1080 • Vs A12X Bionic • Vs Exynos 2100 • Vs Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Snapdragon 865 • Vs A14 Bionic • Vs Dimensity 1000L • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Exynos 990 • Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Kirin 990 5G • Vs Kirin 990E • Vs Dimensity 1000C • Vs Kirin 985 • Vs A12 Bionic • Vs Dimensity 820 • Vs Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Kirin 820 5G • Vs Exynos 9825 • Vs Kirin 980 • Vs Snapdragon 768G • Vs Dimensity 800 • Vs Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Dimensity 800U • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
| |
|