Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 benchmark which processor is better

Snapdragon 875 vs Kirin 985

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985, compare of GPUs Adreno 660 and Mali-G77 MP8.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 875 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Kirin 985 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as PassMark, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, Geekbench 5, Quadrant, Neocore, PCMark, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 875 or Kirin 985 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 875

99%

Kirin 985

82%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 875

96%

Kirin 985

77%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 875

96%

Kirin 985

77%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 875	Kirin 985
Total score	892580	423580
CPU	249924	118598
GPU	339178	160953
MEM	142802	67777
UX	160655	76252

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 875	Kirin 985
Single-Core	1404	880
Multi-Core	4904	2995

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 875	Kirin 985
Frequency	2840 MHz	2580 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55	1x2.58 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.84 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	2750	1600
Memory bandwidth	51.2	34.1
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	512 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 875 is 9% better than Kirin 985 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 660	Mali-G77 MP8
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	1486	628
# of Cores		8
# of Shader Units	512
Display	3840 x 2160 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	34.8	27.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	105.8	54.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	63.4	56.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	58.4	41.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	90.5	45.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	130.5	75.1
Real Racing 3	126.8	98.4
Sniper 3D	139.5	106.8
Need for Speed No Limits	88.8	89.9
Mortal Kombat X	91.9	73.1
CSR Racing 2	76.1	73.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	32 MP
Dual Camera resolution	36 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Qualcomm Spectra 480
Video Encoding FPS	60	60
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X57 Modem-RF System 5G	21
Download speed	15000 MBit/s.	1277 MBit/s.
Upload speed	6000 MBit/s.	175 MBit/s.
Navigation	Beidou, NavIC enabled, SBAS, GPS, GNSS, Galileo, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 is better: 37
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 985 is better: 4
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Snapdragon 875 and Kirin 985, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Snapdragon 875 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 875 specs and review.

Kirin 985 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Kirin 985 specs and review.