|
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 |
|
Comparisons 22-05-2022 Full testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like 3DMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Neocore, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, and how good the SoCs are in games Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, PUBG etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 or Snapdragon 875.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon G3x Gen 1 | 79% |
Snapdragon 875 | 64% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 | 82% |
Snapdragon 875 | 79% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon G3x Gen 1 | 77% |
Snapdragon 875 | 61% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 |
Snapdragon 875 | Total score | 1096026 | 892580 | CPU | 306879 | 249924 | GPU | 416493 | 339178 | MEM | 175369 | 142802 | UX | 197274 | 160655 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 |
Snapdragon 875 | Single-Core | 1528 | 1404 | Multi-Core | 4819 | 4904 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 |
Snapdragon 875 | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2840 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 14000 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 12 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 2750 | Memory bandwidth | 88 | 51.2 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 is 11% better than Snapdragon 875 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 660 | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 1800 | 1486 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 1024 | 512 | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 41.6 | 34.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 129.5 | 105.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 78.3 | 63.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 71.9 | 58.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 111.9 | 90.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 160.3 | 130.5 | Real Racing 3 | 156.2 | 126.8 | Sniper 3D | 171.1 | 139.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 108.9 | 88.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 112.1 | 91.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 93.5 | 76.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 36 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | Qualcomm Spectra 480 | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X57 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 6000 MBit/s. | Navigation | SBAS, QZSS, Galileo, NavIC enabled, NavIC, GPS, Beidou, GNSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS | Beidou, NavIC enabled, SBAS, GPS, GNSS, Galileo, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 is better: 4 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Snapdragon 875 SoC Comparisons • Vs A12Z Bionic • Vs Snapdragon 888 • Vs Kirin 9000 • Vs Kirin 9000E • Vs Exynos 1080 • Vs A12X Bionic • Vs Exynos 2100 • Vs Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Snapdragon 865 • Vs A14 Bionic • Vs Dimensity 1000L • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Exynos 990 • Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Kirin 990 5G • Vs Kirin 990E • Vs Dimensity 1000C • Vs Kirin 985 • Vs A12 Bionic • Vs Dimensity 820 • Vs Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Kirin 820 5G • Vs Exynos 9825 • Vs Kirin 980 • Vs Snapdragon 768G • Vs Dimensity 800 • Vs Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Dimensity 800U • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
| |
|