|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875, speed examination of GPUs Adreno 660 and Adreno 650. This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 870 5G is octa-core (Kryo 585 Prime) and Snapdragon 875 is octa-core (Cortex-X1). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, Neocore, Geekbench, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, Quadrant, PassMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Snapdragon 870 5G or Snapdragon 875 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 870 5G | 50% |
Snapdragon 875 | 64% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 870 5G | 76% |
Snapdragon 875 | 79% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 870 5G | 47% |
Snapdragon 875 | 61% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 870 5G |
Snapdragon 875 | Total score | 703475 | 892580 | CPU | 196982 | 249924 | GPU | 267320 | 339178 | MEM | 112558 | 142802 | UX | 126630 | 160655 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 870 5G |
Snapdragon 875 | Single-Core | 1106 | 1404 | Multi-Core | 3869 | 4904 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 870 5G |
Snapdragon 875 | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2840 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 Prime 3x2.48 GHz Kryo 585 Gold 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 585 Silver | 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2750 | 2750 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 51.2 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 870 5G is 11% better than Snapdragon 875 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 | GPU Frequency | 645 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 1348 | 1486 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 512 | 512 | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.4 | 34.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 82.2 | 105.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 50.3 | 63.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 46.3 | 58.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 71.4 | 90.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 103.8 | 130.5 | Real Racing 3 | 62.9 | 126.8 | Sniper 3D | 95.6 | 139.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 90.5 | 88.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 65.4 | 91.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 65.4 | 76.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 25 MP | 36 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 480 | Qualcomm Spectra 480 | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X57 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 6000 MBit/s. | Navigation | Beidou, GPS, Galileo, NavIC enabled, Dual frequency GNSS, QZSS, GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS | Beidou, NavIC enabled, SBAS, GPS, GNSS, Galileo, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 is better: 25 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 870 5G SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Snapdragon 875 SoC Comparisons • Vs A12Z Bionic • Vs Snapdragon 888 • Vs Kirin 9000 • Vs Kirin 9000E • Vs Exynos 1080 • Vs A12X Bionic • Vs Exynos 2100 • Vs Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Snapdragon 865 • Vs A14 Bionic • Vs Dimensity 1000L • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Exynos 990 • Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Kirin 990 5G • Vs Kirin 990E • Vs Dimensity 1000C • Vs Kirin 985 • Vs A12 Bionic • Vs Dimensity 820 • Vs Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Kirin 820 5G • Vs Exynos 9825 • Vs Kirin 980 • Vs Snapdragon 768G • Vs Dimensity 800 • Vs Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Dimensity 800U • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
| |
|