Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G benchmark which processor is better

Snapdragon 875 vs Snapdragon 690 5G

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, comparison of GPUs Adreno 619L and Adreno 660.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 875 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Snapdragon 690 5G is octa-core (Kryo 560). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, Quadrant, Octane V2, GFXBench, and how good the SoCs are in games PUBG, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 875 or Snapdragon 690 5G and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 875

64%

Snapdragon 690 5G

24%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 875

79%

Snapdragon 690 5G

74%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 875

61%

Snapdragon 690 5G

21%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 875	Snapdragon 690 5G
Total score	892580	339723
CPU	249924	95116
GPU	339178	129086
MEM	142802	54361
UX	160655	61145

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 875	Snapdragon 690 5G
Single-Core	1404	760
Multi-Core	4904	2587

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 875	Snapdragon 690 5G
Frequency	2840 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	8 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55	8x2.0 GHz Kryo 560
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)	LPDDR4x (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory	16 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	2750	1866
Memory bandwidth	51.2	14.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	512 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 875 is 29% better than Snapdragon 690 5G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 660	Adreno 619L
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	975 MHz
GFloPS	1486	486
# of Cores
# of Shader Units	512	316
Display	3840 x 2160 pixels	2840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	34.8	24.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	105.8	55.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	63.4	45.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	58.4	41.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	90.5	45.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	130.5	71.4
Real Racing 3	126.8	80.3
Sniper 3D	139.5	59.7
Need for Speed No Limits	88.8	82.6
Mortal Kombat X	91.9	66.6
CSR Racing 2	76.1	59.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	36 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Qualcomm Spectra 480	Qualcomm Spectra 355L
Video Encoding FPS	60	240
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP8, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X57 Modem-RF System 5G	Snapdragon X51 5G Modem-RF System
Download speed	15000 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	6000 MBit/s.	900 MBit/s.
Navigation	Beidou, NavIC enabled, SBAS, GPS, GNSS, Galileo, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS	GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, Beidou, SBAS, GNSS
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 is better: 35
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G is better: 3
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Snapdragon 875 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 875 specs and review.

Snapdragon 690 5G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 690 5G specs and review.