Comparisons 11-03-2021
So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, comparison of GPUs Adreno 619L and Adreno 660.
This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 875 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Snapdragon 690 5G is octa-core (Kryo 560). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench 5, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, Quadrant, Octane V2, GFXBench, and how good the SoCs are in games PUBG, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 875 or Snapdragon 690 5G and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 875 | 99% |
Snapdragon 690 5G | 68% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 875 | 96% |
Snapdragon 690 5G | 75% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 875 | 96% |
Snapdragon 690 5G | 66% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 875 |
Snapdragon 690 5G | | Total score | 892580 | 339723 | | CPU | 267378 | 101719 | | GPU | 333014 | 126702 | | MEM | 152951 | 58124 | | UX | 139231 | 52732 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 875 |
Snapdragon 690 5G | | Single-Core | 1404 | 760 | | Multi-Core | 4904 | 2587 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 875 |
Snapdragon 690 5G | | Frequency | 2840 MHz | 2000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 8 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1
3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x (Quad Channel) | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2750 | 1866 | | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 | 14.9 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 875 is 29% better than Snapdragon 690 5G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 619L | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 975 MHz | | GFloPS | 1486 | 486 | | # of Cores | | | | # of Shader Units | 512 | 316 | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 2840 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | 34.8 | 24.3 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 105.8 | 55.8 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 63.4 | 45.9 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | 58.4 | 41.9 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 90.5 | 45.3 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 130.5 | 71.4 | | Real Racing 3 | 126.8 | 80.3 | | Sniper 3D | 139.5 | 59.7 | | Need for Speed No Limits | 88.8 | 82.6 | | Mortal Kombat X | 91.9 | 66.6 | | CSR Racing 2 | 76.1 | 59.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 192 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 36 MP | 16 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 480 | Qualcomm Spectra 355L | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP8, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X57 Modem-RF System 5G | Snapdragon X51 5G Modem-RF System | | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 900 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Beidou, NavIC enabled, SBAS, GPS, GNSS, Galileo, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS | GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, Beidou, SBAS, GNSS | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 is better: 35
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G is better: 3
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs A12Z Bionic
• Vs Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Kirin 9000
• Vs Kirin 9000E
• Vs Exynos 1080
• Vs A12X Bionic
• Vs Exynos 2100
• Vs Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Samsung Exynos 1080 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Apple A12X Bionic Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Samsung Exynos 2100 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Samsung Exynos 2000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• MediaTek Dimensity 1200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
|
