|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Apple A16 Bionic |
|
Comparisons 01-11-2024 Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Apple A16 Bionic, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, Geekbench 6, Neocore, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, PassMark, Antutu v10, 9, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, PUBG etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Snapdragon 8 Elite or A16 Bionic.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 8 Elite | 100% |
A16 Bionic | 71% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 8 Elite | 88% |
A16 Bionic | 84% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 8 Elite | 98% |
A16 Bionic | 70% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
A16 Bionic | Total score | 3123644 | 994406 | CPU | 874624 | 278424 | GPU | 1186984 | 377874 | MEM | 499774 | 159102 | UX | 562252 | 179002 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
A16 Bionic | Single-Core | 3395 | 1903 | Multi-Core | 10489 | 5589 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
A16 Bionic | Frequency | 4320 MHz | 3460 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 14000 millions | 16000 millions | Core configuration | 2x4.32 GHz Oryon (Phoenix L) 6x3.53 GHz Oryon (Phoenix M) | 2x3.46 GHz ARM 4x2.02 GHz ARM | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 5300 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 92 | 96 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 32 MB | 64 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9 | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 8 Elite is 19% better than A16 Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon 8 Elite has -2 more core than A16 Bionic. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 830 | Apple A16 Bionic | GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 3460 MHz | GFloPS | 3382 | 3200 | # of Cores | | 5 | # of Shader Units | 3072 | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 116.6 | 37.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 372.6 | 118.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 220.1 | 69.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 205.1 | 64.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 314.4 | 100.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 454.5 | 145.3 | Real Racing 3 | 444.4 | 141.5 | Sniper 3D | 485.2 | 155.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 309.7 | 98.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 321.3 | 101.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 265.5 | 85.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 320 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 240 MP | 12 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 770 | Apple ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X80 Modem-RF System 5G | 5G Modem | Download speed | 10000 MBit/s. | 9000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | Navigation | GNSS, QZSS, GPS, NavIC, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, NavIC enabled | NavIC enabled, GNSS, NavIC, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, QZSS, SBAS, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic is better: 6 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
A16 Bionic SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Apple A16 Bionic Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs Apple A9 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
| |
|