|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 |
|
Comparisons 01-11-2024 Full testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as PCMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Neocore, GFXBench, Geekbench, PassMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, PUBG etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 8 Elite or Dimensity 8050.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 8 Elite | 100% |
Dimensity 8050 | 54% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 8 Elite | 88% |
Dimensity 8050 | 82% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 8 Elite | 98% |
Dimensity 8050 | 52% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
Dimensity 8050 | Total score | 3123644 | 760798 | CPU | 874624 | 213023 | GPU | 1186984 | 289096 | MEM | 499774 | 121725 | UX | 562252 | 136943 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
Dimensity 8050 | Single-Core | 3395 | 1219 | Multi-Core | 10489 | 4243 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
Dimensity 8050 | Frequency | 4320 MHz | 3000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 3 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | 14000 millions | | Core configuration | 2x4.32 GHz Oryon (Phoenix L) 6x3.53 GHz Oryon (Phoenix M) | 1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 5300 | 4266 | Memory bandwidth | 92 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 4 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 32 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 8 Elite is 30% better than Dimensity 8050 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G77 MC9 | GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 3382 | 504 | # of Cores | | 9 | # of Shader Units | 3072 | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 116.6 | 30.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 372.6 | 90.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 220.1 | 53.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 205.1 | 50.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 314.4 | 77.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 454.5 | 111.9 | Real Racing 3 | 444.4 | 108.7 | Sniper 3D | 485.2 | 119.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 309.7 | 75.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 321.3 | 79.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 265.5 | 65.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 320 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 240 MP | 32 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 770 | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X80 Modem-RF System 5G | 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 10000 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | GNSS, QZSS, GPS, NavIC, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, NavIC enabled | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite is better: 40
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8050 is better: 2 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Dimensity 8050 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
| |
|