Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875

Comparisons   17-05-2022
   Full comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GFXBench, Quadrant, PassMark, Geekbench, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of processors in Madout2, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA etc.
   After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chipset is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8000 or Snapdragon 875.

 
MediaTek Dimensity 8000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 875

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors

CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MediaTek Dimensity 800096% Snapdragon 87599%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MediaTek Dimensity 800088% Snapdragon 87596%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MediaTek Dimensity 800091% Snapdragon 87596%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Snapdragon 875
Total score777515892580
CPU163368267378
GPU139627333014
MEM106600152951
UX93142139231

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Snapdragon 875
Single-Core11451404
Multi-Core40154904

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Snapdragon 875
Frequency2750 MHz2840 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography5 nm5 nm
Transistors count6200 millions
Core configuration4x2.75 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1
3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)8 W10 W
Memory typeLPDDR5LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory32 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency64002750
Memory bandwidth4851.2
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache64 KB512 KB
L2 cache640 KB1 MB
L3 cache16 MB4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8.4-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 875 is 3% better than MediaTek Dimensity 8000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G610 MP6Adreno 660
GPU Frequency600 MHz700 MHz
GFloPS9121486
# of Cores6
# of Shader Units512
Display2560 x 1440 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile34.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)105.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra63.4
Call of Duty: Mobile58.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)90.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition130.5
Real Racing 3126.8
Sniper 3D139.5
Need for Speed No Limits88.8
Mortal Kombat X91.9
CSR Racing 276.1
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution200 MP200 MP
Dual Camera resolution32 MP36 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 480
Video Encoding FPS24060
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10


Networks and Navigation
ModemSub 6GHz 5G Multi-ModeQualcomm Snapdragon X57 Modem-RF System 5G
Download speed4700 MBit/s.15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed2500 MBit/s.6000 MBit/s.
NavigationQZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavICBeidou, NavIC enabled, SBAS, GPS, GNSS, Galileo, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportYesYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8000 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 is better: 31
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile


CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile


CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
Categories
 • Comparisons
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 5
 • Antutu 8
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands
Last added

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX G..
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX C..
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX C..
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX C..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 1200..
Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 1100..
Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 865..
Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 1050..
Exynos 2200 vs A14 Bionic..
Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 778G+..