 |
Rockchip RK3126C vs Intel Atom x3-C3230RK |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks Rockchip RK3126C vs Intel Atom x3-C3230RK, comparison of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-450 MP4. This performance comparison includes two processors: Rockchip RK3126C is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Atom x3-C3230RK is quad-core (). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, PCMark, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, GFXBench, and how good the CPUs are in games Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Fortnite etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Rockchip RK3126C or Atom x3-C3230RK and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreRockchip RK3126C | 1% |
Atom x3-C3230RK | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Rockchip RK3126C | 32% |
Atom x3-C3230RK | 26% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingRockchip RK3126C | 1% |
Atom x3-C3230RK | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Rockchip RK3126C |
Atom x3-C3230RK | Total score | 19847 | 19471 | CPU | 5558 | 5444 | GPU | 7536 | 7398 | MEM | 3169 | 3106 | UX | 3579 | 3505 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Rockchip RK3126C |
Atom x3-C3230RK | Single-Core | 52 | 51 | Multi-Core | 242 | 238 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Rockchip RK3126C |
Atom x3-C3230RK | Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1100 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x1.1 GHz | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR2/3 | Max. Memory | 1 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1333 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Rockchip RK3126C is 15% better than Atom x3-C3230RK in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-400 MP2 | Mali-450 MP4 | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 9 | 35.77 | # of Cores | 2 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 3.1 | 6.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.5 | 16.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 8.6 | 10.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 6.6 | 9.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 10.1 | 13.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 18.2 | 20.3 | Real Racing 3 | 10.8 | 20.4 | Sniper 3D | 11.2 | 16.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 12 | 18.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 9.9 | 13.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 12 | 11.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | A-GOLD 620 | Upload speed | | 6 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3126C is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3230RK is better: 21 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Rockchip RK3126C SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Atom x3-C3230RK SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
| |
|