Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 vs Intel Atom x3-C3230RK

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 vs Intel Atom x3-C3230RK, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 306 and Mali-450 MP4.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Atom x3-C3230RK is quad-core (). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as Neocore, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, Geekbench, GFXBench, PCMark, Vellamo, PassMark, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite etc.

After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 or Atom x3-C3230RK and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 410 APQ8016

Atom x3-C3230RK

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 410 APQ8016

22%

Atom x3-C3230RK

26%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 410 APQ8016

Atom x3-C3230RK

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 410 APQ8016	Atom x3-C3230RK
Total score	20469	19471
CPU	5724	5444
GPU	7787	7398
MEM	3270	3106
UX	3684	3505

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 410 APQ8016	Atom x3-C3230RK
Single-Core	54	51
Multi-Core	250	238

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 410 APQ8016	Atom x3-C3230RK
Frequency	1200 MHz	1100 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.1 GHz
Power consumption (TDP)	4 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2/3	LPDDR2/3
Max. Memory	2 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	533	1333
Memory bandwidth	6	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 is 8% better than Atom x3-C3230RK in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 306	Mali-450 MP4
GPU Frequency	400 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	21.6	35.77
# of Cores		4
# of Shader Units	24
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	5.5	6.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	16.4	16.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	10.8	10.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	8.5	9.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.5	13.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	20.6	20.3
Real Racing 3	16.2	20.4
Sniper 3D	23.8	16.3
Need for Speed No Limits	15.1	18.4
Mortal Kombat X	15.7	13.3
CSR Racing 2	14	11.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon LTE modem	A-GOLD 620
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	21 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	6 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3230RK is better: 11
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 and Atom x3-C3230RK, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 specs and review.

Atom x3-C3230RK SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Atom x3-C3230RK specs and review.