|
MediaTek MT6572M vs Intel Atom x3-C3230RK |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6572M vs Intel Atom x3-C3230RK, speed testing of GPUs Mali-450 MP4 and Mali-400. This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6572M is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Atom x3-C3230RK is quad-core (). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as Quadrant, Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, Octane V2, PCMark, AnTuTu 8, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Fortnite etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chipset is better to buy MT6572M or Atom x3-C3230RK and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT6572M | 1% |
Atom x3-C3230RK | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT6572M | 22% |
Atom x3-C3230RK | 26% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT6572M | 1% |
Atom x3-C3230RK | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6572M |
Atom x3-C3230RK | Total score | 11264 | 19471 | CPU | 3147 | 5444 | GPU | 4274 | 7398 | MEM | 1793 | 3106 | UX | 2027 | 3505 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6572M |
Atom x3-C3230RK | Single-Core | 29 | 51 | Multi-Core | 137 | 238 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6572M |
Atom x3-C3230RK | Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x1.1 GHz | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR2 | LPDDR2/3 | Max. Memory | 1 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 266 | 1333 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom x3-C3230RK is 9% better than MT6572M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6572M has 2 more core than Atom x3-C3230RK. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-400 | Mali-450 MP4 | GPU Frequency | 500 MHz | 600 MHz | GFloPS | 4.5 | 35.77 | # of Cores | 1 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 960 x 540 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 2.9 | 6.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 8.7 | 16.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 4.1 | 10.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 4.9 | 9.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 6.4 | 13.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 10.4 | 20.3 | Real Racing 3 | 8.2 | 20.4 | Sniper 3D | 7.8 | 16.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 7.4 | 18.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 4.7 | 13.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 4.5 | 11.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 5 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | HD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | A-GOLD 620 | Upload speed | | 6 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6572M is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3230RK is better: 34 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MT6572M SoC Comparisons • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
Atom x3-C3230RK SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
| |
|