MediaTek MT6737T vs MediaTek MT6739WA

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6737T vs MediaTek MT6739WA, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T860 MP2.

This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6737T is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6739WA is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, AnTuTu 8, Neocore, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Octane V2, GFXBench, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, and how good the CPUs are in games Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy MT6737T or MT6739WA and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6737T

MT6739WA

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6737T

27%

MT6739WA

30%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6737T

MT6739WA

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6737T	MT6739WA
Total score	38244	40143
CPU	10710	11242
GPU	14523	15253
MEM	6121	6420
UX	6884	7221

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6737T	MT6739WA
Single-Core	101	106
Multi-Core	467	490

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6737T	MT6739WA
Frequency	1500 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2, LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	3 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	733	667
Memory bandwidth	4	6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6737T is 13% better than MT6739WA in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T860 MP2
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	20.4	54.31
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1920 x 1080 pixels	1440 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	12.4	12.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	31.9	32.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	20.7	21.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	17.9	18.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	26.7	27.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	39.2	41.5
Real Racing 3	31.1	27.1
Sniper 3D	39.3	34.7
Need for Speed No Limits	24.8	34.7
Mortal Kombat X	23.8	28.2
CSR Racing 2	24.8	28.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737T is better: 8
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6739WA is better: 19
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets MT6737T and MT6739WA, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6737T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6737T specs and review.

MT6739WA SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6739WA specs and review.