|
Unisoc UIS8141E vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) |
|
Comparisons 03-11-2023 Comprehensive testing data of Unisoc UIS8141E vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795), comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, Quadrant, GFXBench, Geekbench, Neocore, PassMark, PCMark, and how good the chipsets are in games Asphalt 9, GTA, Madout2, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, PUBG etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Unisoc UIS8141E or Helio X10 (MT6795).
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreUnisoc UIS8141E | 1% |
Helio X10 (MT6795) | 3% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Unisoc UIS8141E | 42% |
Helio X10 (MT6795) | 20% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingUnisoc UIS8141E | 1% |
Helio X10 (MT6795) | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Unisoc UIS8141E |
Helio X10 (MT6795) | Total score | 42551 | 50430 | CPU | 11923 | 14114 | GPU | 16177 | 19163 | MEM | 6807 | 8066 | UX | 7663 | 9083 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Unisoc UIS8141E |
Helio X10 (MT6795) | Single-Core | 112 | 130 | Multi-Core | 519 | 587 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Unisoc UIS8141E |
Helio X10 (MT6795) | Frequency | 1300 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 3 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 266 | 933 | Memory bandwidth | 18 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X10 (MT6795) is 35% better than Unisoc UIS8141E in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Unisoc UIS8141E has 4 more core than Helio X10 (MT6795). Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T820 | PowerVR G6200 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 10.2 | 89.6 | # of Cores | 1 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1440 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 12.2 | 16.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 34.6 | 42.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 22.5 | 28.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 20.5 | 25.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 29.1 | 35.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 44.5 | 53.9 | Real Racing 3 | 40.2 | 35.1 | Sniper 3D | 29.8 | 61.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 41.1 | 39.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 26.5 | 32.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 32.8 | 39.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc UIS8141E is better: 10
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) is better: 27 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Unisoc UIS8141E SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Helio X10 (MT6795) SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
| |
|