MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G57 MC2 and Mali-G76 MP12.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Dimensity 700 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76) and Kirin 990E is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications such as Vellamo, Octane V2, GFXBench, PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu, Quadrant, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Fortnite etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy Dimensity 700 or Kirin 990E and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 700

20%

Kirin 990E

31%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 700

76%

Kirin 990E

75%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 700

19%

Kirin 990E

29%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 700	Kirin 990E
Total score	285883	433894
CPU	80048	121487
GPU	108632	164888
MEM	45749	69424
UX	51452	78108

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 700	Kirin 990E
Single-Core	640	929
Multi-Core	2177	3068

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 700	Kirin 990E
Frequency	2200 MHz	2860 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
Transistors count		10300 millions
Core configuration	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 2x2.36 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.95 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	12 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	1600
Memory bandwidth	17.07	31.78
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache		512 KB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 990E is 23% better than Dimensity 700 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G76 MP12
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	486	489.38
# of Cores	2	12
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.8	28.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	46.4	56.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	45.5	58.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	38.9	42.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	36.1	47.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	59.9	77.8
Real Racing 3	56.9	102.7
Sniper 3D	100.1	111.5
Need for Speed No Limits	63.7	93.9
Mortal Kombat X	72.8	67.5
CSR Racing 2	50.1	64.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	64 MP	32 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	5G NR
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	2300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	500 MBit/s.	1250 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS L1CA, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I, Galileo E1, GPS L1CA	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 700 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 990E is better: 28
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Dimensity 700 and Kirin 990E, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Dimensity 700 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Dimensity 700 specs and review.

Kirin 990E SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 990E specs and review.