|
MediaTek MT8188J vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 |
|
Comparisons 18-06-2023 Detailed testing data of MediaTek MT8188J vs MediaTek Dimensity 700, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Neocore, GFXBench, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, and how good the processors are in games PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, GTA etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy MT8188J or Dimensity 700.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT8188J | 25% |
Dimensity 700 | 20% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT8188J | 72% |
Dimensity 700 | 76% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT8188J | 24% |
Dimensity 700 | 19% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT8188J |
Dimensity 700 | Total score | 360113 | 285883 | CPU | 100831 | 80048 | GPU | 136847 | 108632 | MEM | 57613 | 45749 | UX | 64810 | 51452 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT8188J |
Dimensity 700 | Single-Core | 665 | 640 | Multi-Core | 2195 | 2177 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT8188J |
Dimensity 700 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 12 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 28 | 17.07 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 950 MHz | GFloPS | 486 | 486 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.5 | 26.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 55.6 | 46.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 45.1 | 45.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 37.7 | 38.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 46.4 | 36.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 71.9 | 59.9 | Real Racing 3 | 67.6 | 56.9 | Sniper 3D | 72.1 | 100.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 81.1 | 63.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 72.2 | 72.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 58.4 | 50.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 750 MBit/s. | 2770 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 300 MBit/s. | 500 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | QZSS L1CA, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I, Galileo E1, GPS L1CA | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8188J is better: 19
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 700 is better: 15 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT8188J SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Dimensity 700 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|