|
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Samsung Exynos 9810 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Samsung Exynos 9810, comparison of GPUs Mali-G57 MC2 and Mali-G72 MP18. This performance comparison involves two processors: Dimensity 700 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76) and Exynos 9810 is octa-core (Exynos M3 Mongoose). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, AnTuTu, Quadrant, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, Octane V2, PassMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile etc. After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 700 or Exynos 9810 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreDimensity 700 | 20% |
Exynos 9810 | 15% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Dimensity 700 | 76% |
Exynos 9810 | 63% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingDimensity 700 | 19% |
Exynos 9810 | 13% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 700 |
Exynos 9810 | Total score | 285883 | 214536 | CPU | 80048 | 60078 | GPU | 108632 | 81523 | MEM | 45749 | 34334 | UX | 51452 | 38617 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 700 |
Exynos 9810 | Single-Core | 640 | 442 | Multi-Core | 2177 | 1770 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 700 |
Exynos 9810 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2900 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.9 GHz Exynos M3 Mongoose 4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 12 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 17.07 | 26.82 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9810 is 24% better than Dimensity 700 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G72 MP18 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 486 | 519.97 | # of Cores | 2 | 18 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.8 | 19.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 46.4 | 39.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 45.5 | 45.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 38.9 | 35.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 36.1 | 34.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 59.9 | 49.9 | Real Racing 3 | 56.9 | 79.8 | Sniper 3D | 100.1 | 73 | Need for Speed No Limits | 63.7 | 63.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 72.8 | 73 | CSR Racing 2 | 50.1 | 50.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 28 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 28 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Multi-Mode | LTE Cat.13/18 2/5 CA | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 900 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 500 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Navigation | QZSS L1CA, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I, Galileo E1, GPS L1CA | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 700 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9810 is better: 14 You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Dimensity 700 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Exynos 9810 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
| |
|