Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998, compare of GPUs Mali-G57 MC2 and Adreno 540.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Dimensity 700 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76) and Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 is octa-core (Kryo 280). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as Neocore, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, PassMark, 3DMark, PCMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Dimensity 700 or Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2.

 
MediaTek Dimensity 700
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Dimensity 70020% Snapdragon 835 MSM899812%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Dimensity 70076% Snapdragon 835 MSM899863%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Dimensity 70019% Snapdragon 835 MSM899810%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Dimensity 700 Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
Total score285883171349
CPU8004847987
GPU10863265116
MEM4574927406
UX5145230849

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Dimensity 700 Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
Single-Core640421
Multi-Core21771475

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Dimensity 700 Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
Frequency2200 MHz2600 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
8x2.45 GHz Kryo 280
Power consumption (TDP)10 W9 W
Memory typeLPDDR4xLPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory12 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency21331866
Memory bandwidth17.0729.8
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache128 KB
L2 cache2 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8.1-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 is 15% better than Dimensity 700 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 540
GPU Frequency950 MHz710 MHz
GFloPS486566.61
# of Cores2
# of Shader Units384
Display2520 x 1080 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile26.822.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)46.427.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra45.557.3
Call of Duty: Mobile38.929.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)36.123.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition59.932.7
Real Racing 356.9100.3
Sniper 3D100.174.5
Need for Speed No Limits63.780.2
Mortal Kombat X72.891.7
CSR Racing 250.174.5
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution64 MP32 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 180
Video Encoding FPS24030
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9


Networks and Navigation
Modem5G Multi-ModeQualcomm Snapdragon X16 LTE modem
Download speed2770 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed500 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationQZSS L1CA, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I, Galileo E1, GPS L1CAGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 700 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 is better: 15
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Dimensity 700 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


Dimensity 700 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603


Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands