Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm QCS4290 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm QCS4290 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro

Comparisons   18-02-2023
   Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm QCS4290 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PassMark, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Quadrant, 3DMark, Geekbench, and how good the chipsets are in games Fortnite, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2 etc.
   After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy QCS4290 or Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro.


 
Qualcomm QCS4290
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
QCS429012% Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro10%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
QCS429070% Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro54%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
QCS429011% Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro9%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
QCS4290 Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
Total score175559149901
CPU4914941975
GPU6670956961
MEM2809923984
UX3160926987

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
QCS4290 Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
Single-Core359306
Multi-Core15111349

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
QCS4290 Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
Frequency2000 MHz2400 MHz
Cores84
Bit6464
Lithography11 nm14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260
4x2.4 GHz Kryo 280
Power consumption (TDP)9 W11 W
Memory typeLPDDR4x (Dual Channel)LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory8 Gb6 Gb
Memory Frequency1866/9331866
Memory bandwidth13.9129.8
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache64 KB
L2 cache3 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro is 16% better than QCS4290 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that QCS4290 has -4 more core than Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 530
GPU Frequency750 MHz650 MHz
GFloPS312518.73
# of Cores
# of Shader Units192256
Display1600 x 900 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile23.327.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)27.426.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra58.653.8
Call of Duty: Mobile30.428.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)24.821.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition33.837.2
Real Racing 373.394.2
Sniper 3D93.469.9
Need for Speed No Limits82.964.6
Mortal Kombat X93.178
CSR Racing 282.459.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution48 MP28 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Triple ISPQualcomm Spectra
Video Encoding FPS6030
Video Encoding resolution4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm QCM4290 LTE modemQualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modem
Download speed410 MBit/s.600 MBit/s.
Upload speed170 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationSBAS, Beidou, GPS, Galileo, NavIC, GLONASS, GNSS, QZSS
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS4290 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro is better: 12
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
QCS4290 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


QCS4290 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm QCM4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T700
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Apple A10 Fusion
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Apple A11 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Apple A9
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22T
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1


Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands