|
Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Core i5-2400 |
|
Processor comparisons 17-07-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Core i5-2400 and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, video editing, streaming, programming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, AIDA64, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, 7zip, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, PCMark 10, PassMark, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Gears 5, RealBench, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-2400 or Intel Celeron N4500.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Celeron N4500 | 50% |
Core i5-2400 | 51% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-2400 is 1% better than Celeron N4500. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Celeron N4500 | 50% |
Core i5-2400 | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.2 | 90.5 | Valorant | 101.4 | 102.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.8 | 57.6 | Apex Legends | 95.3 | 96.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.0 | 77.2 | Overwatch | 82.1 | 83.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 69.9 | 71.0 | DOOM Eternal | 50.7 | 51.4 | Warzone | 79.1 | 80.2 | Assassin's Creed | 85.2 | 86.4 | Valheim | 84.1 | 85.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Celeron N4500 | 337% |
Core i5-2400 | 26% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N4500 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-2400 as it consumes less power: 6W vs. 95W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron N4500 |
Intel Core i5-2400 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 71 | 104 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 189 | 378 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 153 | 267 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 459 | 941 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 333 | 635 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1222 | 2350 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N4500 |
Intel Core i5-2400 | Single-Core | 1002 | 1589 | Multi-Core | 2472 | 3799 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N4500 |
Intel Core i5-2400 | Single-Core | 608 | 756 | Multi-Core | 1184 | 2483 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Celeron N4500 |
Intel Core i5-2400 | Announcement date | January 11, 2021 | October 01, 2010 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1338 | LGA1155 | Core name | Jasper Lake | Sandy Bridge | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 11 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 1.1 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | | 5 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 32 nm | Transistors count | 1400 millions | 2480 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 95 W | Memory type | DDR4 LPDDR4x | DDR3 1066/1333 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 21 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-2400 is 64% better than Celeron N4500 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N4500 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-2400 is better: 29 However, it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Celeron N4500 and Intel Core i5-2400 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Celeron N4500 Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Intel Core i5-2400 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Core i3-6100
| |
|