|
Intel Core i5-L16G7 vs Intel Celeron N4500 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-01-2022 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-L16G7 vs Intel Celeron N4500 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, RealBench, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, Prime95, 3DMark, Blender, 7zip, PassMark, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, AIDA64, Furmark, WPrime. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N4500 or Intel Core i5-L16G7.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-L16G7 | 51% |
Celeron N4500 | 50% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-L16G7 is 1% better than Celeron N4500. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-L16G7 | 51% |
Celeron N4500 | 50% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.9 | 89.2 | Valorant | 102.2 | 101.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.2 | 56.8 | Apex Legends | 96.0 | 95.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.6 | 76.0 | Overwatch | 82.8 | 82.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.5 | 69.9 | DOOM Eternal | 51.1 | 50.7 | Warzone | 79.7 | 79.1 | Assassin's Creed | 85.8 | 85.2 | Valheim | 84.8 | 84.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-L16G7 | 430% |
Celeron N4500 | 337% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-L16G7 is more energy efficient than the Celeron N4500 since it has less power consumption: 7W vs. 6W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
Intel Celeron N4500 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 107 | 71 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 251 | 189 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 272 | 153 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 577 | 459 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 794 | 333 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1923 | 1222 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
Intel Celeron N4500 | Single-Core | 1605 | 1002 | Multi-Core | 3297 | 2472 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
Intel Celeron N4500 | Single-Core | 905 | 608 | Multi-Core | 1869 | 1184 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
Intel Celeron N4500 | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | January 11, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FC-CSP1016 | FCBGA1338 | Core name | Lakefield | Jasper Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 11 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Frequency | 1.4 MHz | 1.1 MHz | Cores | 5 | 4 | Threads | 5 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 6800 millions | 1400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR4X 4267 POP Memory | DDR4 LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 34 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-L16G7 is 21% better than Celeron N4500 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-L16G7 has 1 more core than Celeron N4500. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-L16G7 is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N4500 is better: 3 However, it should be understood that all the number in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-L16G7 and Intel Celeron N4500 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-L16G7 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Intel Celeron N4500 Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
| |
|