|
Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Celeron N4500 |
|
Processor comparisons 25-07-2021 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Celeron N4500 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, 3DMark, Gears 5, WPrime, AIDA64, Blender, Prime95, PCMark 10. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N4500 or Intel Celeron N5095.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Celeron N5095 | 51% |
Celeron N4500 | 50% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Celeron N5095 is 1% better than Celeron N4500. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Celeron N5095 | 51% |
Celeron N4500 | 50% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.2 | 89.2 | Valorant | 102.5 | 101.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.4 | 56.8 | Apex Legends | 96.3 | 95.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.8 | 76.0 | Overwatch | 83.0 | 82.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.7 | 69.9 | DOOM Eternal | 51.2 | 50.7 | Warzone | 79.9 | 79.1 | Assassin's Creed | 86.1 | 85.2 | Valheim | 85.0 | 84.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Celeron N5095 | 132% |
Celeron N4500 | 337% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N4500 is more energy efficient than the Celeron N5095 as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 6W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron N5095 |
Intel Celeron N4500 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 103 | 71 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 273 | 189 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 222 | 153 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 663 | 459 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 481 | 333 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1764 | 1222 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5095 |
Intel Celeron N4500 | Single-Core | 1448 | 1002 | Multi-Core | 3571 | 2472 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5095 |
Intel Celeron N4500 | Single-Core | 597 | 608 | Multi-Core | 2119 | 1184 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Celeron N5095 |
Intel Celeron N4500 | Announcement date | January 11, 2021 | January 11, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1338 | FCBGA1338 | Core name | Jasper Lake | Jasper Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 11 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 1.1 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 1400 millions | 1400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 6 W | Memory type | DDR4 LPDDR4x | DDR4 LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Celeron N5095 is 44% better than Celeron N4500 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5095 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N4500 is better: 2 Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Celeron N5095 and Intel Celeron N4500 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron N5095 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Intel Celeron N4500 Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
| |
|