 |
Intel Core i3-6102E vs Intel Celeron N4020 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-6102E vs Intel Celeron N4020 and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Prime95, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, WPrime, MATLAB, Gears 5, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, RealBench, 7zip, VeraCrypt, PassMark, SuperPi, Blender.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N4020 or Intel Core i3-6102E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-6102E | 50% |
Celeron N4020 | 50% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-6102E | 50% |
Celeron N4020 | 50% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.1 | 88.9 | | Valorant | 101.3 | 101.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.7 | 56.6 | | Apex Legends | 95.2 | 95.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.0 | 75.8 | | Overwatch | 82.0 | 81.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 69.9 | 69.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 50.6 | 50.5 | | Warzone | 79.0 | 78.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.1 | 84.9 | | Valheim | 84.1 | 83.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-6102E | 68% |
Celeron N4020 | 263% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N4020 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-6102E as it consumes less power: 25W vs. 6W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-6102E |
Intel Celeron N4020 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 92 | 76 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 239 | 145 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 235 | 88 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 555 | 289 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 395 | 220 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1533 | 811 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-6102E |
Intel Celeron N4020 | | Single-Core | 1057 | 1185 | | Multi-Core | 2356 | 1641 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-6102E |
Intel Celeron N4020 | | Single-Core | 510 | 475 | | Multi-Core | 1109 | 931 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-6102E |
Intel Celeron N4020 | | Announcement date | October 07, 2015 | January 01, 2020 | | Type | Embedded | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1090 | | Core name | Skylake | Gemini Lake Refresh | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | | 2.8 MHz | | Frequency | 1.9 MHz | 1.1 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 2 | | Threads | 4 | 2 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 2000 millions | 1400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 25 W | 6 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4/LPDDR4 (SRET0) up to 2400 MT/s DDR4 (SRKLL) up to 2400 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 8 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 3 MB | 4 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-6102E is 42% better than Celeron N4020 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-6102E is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N4020 is better: 6
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-6102E and Intel Celeron N4020 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-6102E Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Core i5-4230U
Intel Celeron N4020 Processor Comparisons
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
|
|
|
