 |
Intel Core i3-7102E vs Intel Celeron N4020 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-7102E vs Intel Celeron N4020 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as UserBenchmark, Prime95, Blender, Blender, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, RealBench, AIDA64.
And how good the processors are in games: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Celeron N4020 or Intel Core i3-7102E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-7102E | 50% |
Celeron N4020 | 50% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-7102E | 50% |
Celeron N4020 | 50% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.1 | 88.9 | | Valorant | 101.2 | 101.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.7 | 56.6 | | Apex Legends | 95.2 | 95.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 75.9 | 75.8 | | Overwatch | 82.0 | 81.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 69.9 | 69.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 50.6 | 50.5 | | Warzone | 79.0 | 78.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.0 | 84.9 | | Valheim | 84.0 | 83.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-7102E | 75% |
Celeron N4020 | 263% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N4020 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-7102E since it has less power consumption: 25W vs. 6W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-7102E |
Intel Celeron N4020 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 99 | 76 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 256 | 145 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 252 | 88 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 595 | 289 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 424 | 220 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1645 | 811 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-7102E |
Intel Celeron N4020 | | Single-Core | 1279 | 1185 | | Multi-Core | 2528 | 1641 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-7102E |
Intel Celeron N4020 | | Single-Core | 568 | 475 | | Multi-Core | 1074 | 931 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-7102E |
Intel Celeron N4020 | | Announcement date | March 07, 2017 | January 01, 2020 | | Type | Embedded | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1090 | | Core name | Kaby Lake | Gemini Lake Refresh | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 7 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | | 2.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.1 MHz | 1.1 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 2 | | Threads | 4 | 2 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 2000 millions | 1400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 25 W | 6 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | DDR4/LPDDR4 (SRET0) up to 2400 MT/s DDR4 (SRKLL) up to 2400 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 8 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 3 MB | 4 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-7102E is 47% better than Celeron N4020 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-7102E is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N4020 is better: 5
Although it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-7102E and Intel Celeron N4020 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-7102E Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Core i5-4230U
Intel Celeron N4020 Processor Comparisons
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
|
|
|
