 |
Intel Celeron N4020 vs AMD 3015e |
|
Processor comparisons 29-07-2021
For example there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Celeron N4020 vs AMD 3015e and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, programming, video editing, streaming. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, 3DMark, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, PCMark 10, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Blender, Blender, UserBenchmark, SuperPi.
Gaming performance of processors in: - DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD 3015e or Intel Celeron N4020.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Celeron N4020 | 50% |
3015e | 50% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Celeron N4020 | 50% |
3015e | 50% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 88.9 | 89.0 | | Valorant | 101.1 | 101.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.6 | 56.6 | | Apex Legends | 95.0 | 95.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 75.8 | 75.8 | | Overwatch | 81.9 | 81.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 69.7 | 69.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 50.5 | 50.5 | | Warzone | 78.8 | 78.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 84.9 | 84.9 | | Valheim | 83.9 | 83.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Celeron N4020 | 263% |
3015e | 294% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the 3015e is more energy efficient than the Celeron N4020 as it consumes less power: 6W vs. 6W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron N4020 |
AMD 3015e | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 76 | 48 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 145 | 256 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 88 | 122 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 289 | 557 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 220 | 315 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 811 | 1515 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N4020 |
AMD 3015e | | Single-Core | 1185 | 1422 | | Multi-Core | 1641 | 2669 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N4020 |
AMD 3015e | | Single-Core | 475 | 530 | | Multi-Core | 931 | 941 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Celeron N4020 |
AMD 3015e | | Announcement date | January 01, 2020 | July 06, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1090 | FT5 | | Core name | Gemini Lake Refresh | Dali | | Architecture | x86 | Zen | | Generation | 10 | 1 | | Turbo Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Frequency | 1.1 MHz | 1.2 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 2 | | Threads | 2 | 4 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 1400 millions | 800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 6 W | | Memory type | DDR4/LPDDR4 (SRET0) up to 2400 MT/s DDR4 (SRKLL) up to 2400 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | 1MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 4MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | AM3015BRP2OFJ
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here 3015e is 8% better than Celeron N4020 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N4020 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which AMD 3015e is better: 18
Although it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Celeron N4020 and AMD 3015e before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron N4020 Processor Comparisons
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
AMD 3015e Processor Comparisons
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-7102E
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-7020U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
|
|
|
