|
Intel Pentium J6426 vs AMD 3015e |
|
Processor comparisons 28-06-2021 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Pentium J6426 vs AMD 3015e tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, programming, rendering, video editing. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Blender, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Gears 5, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Furmark, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, Blender, PassMark, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, 7zip, AIDA64. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD 3015e or Intel Pentium J6426.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Pentium J6426 | 50% |
3015e | 50% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Pentium J6426 | 50% |
3015e | 50% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.5 | 89.0 | Valorant | 101.7 | 101.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.9 | 56.6 | Apex Legends | 95.6 | 95.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.3 | 75.8 | Overwatch | 82.4 | 81.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.2 | 69.8 | DOOM Eternal | 50.8 | 50.5 | Warzone | 79.3 | 78.9 | Assassin's Creed | 85.4 | 84.9 | Valheim | 84.4 | 83.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Pentium J6426 | 136% |
3015e | 294% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the 3015e is more energy efficient than the Pentium J6426 since it has less power consumption: 10W vs. 6W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Pentium J6426 |
AMD 3015e | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 66 | 48 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 249 | 256 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 282 | 122 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 653 | 557 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 705 | 315 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1678 | 1515 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Pentium J6426 |
AMD 3015e | Single-Core | 1172 | 1422 | Multi-Core | 2969 | 2669 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Pentium J6426 |
AMD 3015e | Single-Core | 410 | 530 | Multi-Core | 1447 | 941 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Pentium J6426 |
AMD 3015e | Announcement date | October 01, 2016 | July 06, 2020 | Type | Embedded | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1493 | FT5 | Core name | Elkhart Lake | Dali | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 7 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.3 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 1.2 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 14 millions | 800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 6 W | Memory type | 4x32 LPDDR4/x 3200MT/s Max 16GB / 2x64 DDR4 3200MT/s Max 32GB | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 1MB | L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | AM3015BRP2OFJ
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Pentium J6426 is 40% better than 3015e in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Pentium J6426 has 2 more core than 3015e. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Pentium J6426 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which AMD 3015e is better: 9 However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Pentium J6426 and AMD 3015e before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Pentium J6426 Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y
AMD 3015e Processor Comparisons • Vs 3020e • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y
| |
|