AMD 3015e vs AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G

Processor comparisons   03-04-2021
   For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD 3015e vs AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Gears 5, AIDA64, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Handbrake, Furmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, MATLAB, SuperPi, RealBench.
   And how good the CPUs are in games:

Valorant
Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
Fallout 76
Borderlands 3
Death Stranding
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Last Man Standing
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Red Dead Redemption 2
Grand Theft Auto V
Overwatch
Watch Dogs Legion
Cyberpunk 2077
Apex Legends
Rainbow Six Siege
Halo Infinite
DOOM: Eternal
Fortnite
Valheim

After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G or AMD 3015e.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

3015e

50%

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

51%

This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Embedded R1305G is 1% better than 3015e. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

3015e

50%

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

50%

For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	89.0	89.5
Valorant	101.1	101.7
Cyberpunk 2077	56.6	56.9
Apex Legends	95.0	95.6
Call of Duty Warzone	75.8	76.3
Overwatch	81.9	82.4
Red Dead Redemption 2	69.8	70.2
DOOM Eternal	50.5	50.8
Warzone	78.9	79.3
Assassin's Creed	84.9	85.4
Valheim	83.9	84.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

3015e

294%

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

284%

To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the 3015e is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Embedded R1305G as it consumes less power: 6W vs. 8W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD 3015e	AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Cinbench 15 Single-core	48	65
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	256	285
Cinbench 20 Single-core	122	166
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	557	683
Cinbench 23 Single-core	315	403
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	1515	1632

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD 3015e	AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Single-Core	1422	1669
Multi-Core	2669	3315

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD 3015e	AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Single-Core	530	682
Multi-Core	941	1460

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

	AMD 3015e	AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Announcement date	July 06, 2020	October 01, 2020
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Socket	FT5	FP5
Core name	Dali	Embedded
Architecture	Zen	Zen+
Generation	1	2
Turbo Frequency	2.3 MHz	2.8 MHz
Frequency	1.2 MHz	1.5 MHz
Cores	2	2
Threads	4	4
Bus rate
Bit	64	64
Lithography	14 nm
Transistors count	800 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	8 W
Memory type	DDR4	DDR4-3200
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency	1600
Memory bandwidth
L1 cache
L2 cache	1MB	1MB
L3 cache	4MB	4MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	No	No
Part number	AM3015BRP2OFJ	YE1305C9T2OFG

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Embedded R1305G is 20% better than 3015e in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD 3015e is better: 3
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G is better: 26
However, it should be realized that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD 3015e and AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.

AMD 3015e - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD 3015e specs and review.

• AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G specs and review.