Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core gaming benchmark

AMD Ryzen 3 3250C vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core

Processor comparisons   23-03-2021
   For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD Ryzen 3 3250C vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core tests and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as SuperPi, AIDA64, 7zip, MATLAB, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Blender, WPrime, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Blender.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • Apex Legends
  • Borderlands 3
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Valorant
  • Halo Infinite
  • Fortnite
  • Death Stranding
  • Fallout 76
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Valheim
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Overwatch
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Last Man Standing
  • Red Dead Redemption 2

   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD FX-6300 Six-Core or AMD Ryzen 3 3250C.

 
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 3 3250C51% FX-6300 Six-Core51%


Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
Ryzen 3 3250C51% FX-6300 Six-Core51%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite89.990.8
Valorant102.1103.2
Cyberpunk 207757.257.8
Apex Legends96.097.0
Call of Duty Warzone76.677.4
Overwatch82.783.6
Red Dead Redemption 270.571.2
DOOM Eternal51.151.6
Warzone79.680.5
Assassin's Creed85.886.7
Valheim84.885.7
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
Ryzen 3 3250C193% FX-6300 Six-Core22%
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 3 3250C is more energy efficient than the FX-6300 Six-Core since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 95W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C AMD FX-6300 Six-Core
Cinbench 15 Single-core14289
Cinbench 15 Multi-core354648
Cinbench 20 Single-core318186
Cinbench 20 Multi-core7741176
Cinbench 23 Single-core573567
Cinbench 23 Multi-core23463624

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C AMD FX-6300 Six-Core
Single-Core19461463
Multi-Core43304132

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C AMD FX-6300 Six-Core
Single-Core871652
Multi-Core18252781

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

AMD Ryzen 3 3250C AMD FX-6300 Six-Core
Announcement dateSeptember 22, 2020October 01, 2012
TypeLaptopDesktop
SocketFP5AM3+
Core nameDaliVishera
ArchitectureZenBulldozer
Generation11
Turbo Frequency3.5 MHz4.1 MHz
Frequency2.6 MHz3.5 MHz
Cores26
Threads4
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm32 nm
Transistors count3800 millions1220 millions
Power consumption (TDP)15 W95 W
Memory typeDDR3
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency1866
Memory bandwidth
L1 cache192KB288KB
L2 cache1MB6MB
L3 cache4MB8MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoNo
Part numberYM325CC4T2OFG
FD6300WMW6KHK
FD6300WMHKBOX
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here FX-6300 Six-Core is 25% better than Ryzen 3 3250C in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that FX-6300 Six-Core has 4 more core than Ryzen 3 3250C. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 3250C is better: 11
The number of parameters for which AMD FX-6300 Six-Core is better: 22
   Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 3 3250C and AMD FX-6300 Six-Core before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD FX-6300 Six-Core - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
• Fortnite gaming benchmark
• PUBG gaming benchmark
• GTA 5 gaming benchmark
• DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark
• Overwatch gaming benchmark
• Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark
• Roblox gaming benchmark
• Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark
• Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark
• Apex Legends gaming benchmark
• Valorant gaming benchmark
• Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark


AMD Ryzen 3 3250C Processor Comparisons
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400E
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-7101TE
• Vs Core i5-7287U
• Vs Core i5-6442EQ
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-6660U
• Vs Core i3-8109U
• Vs Core i3-8121U
• Vs Core i3-7350K
• Vs Pentium Gold G6400
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U


AMD FX-6300 Six-Core Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400E
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Core i5-6287U
• Vs Core i3-7101TE
• Vs Core i5-7287U
• Vs Core i5-6442EQ
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-6660U
• Vs Core i3-8109U
• Vs Core i3-8121U
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Core i3-7350K
• Vs Pentium Gold G6400
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i3-6100
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands